Eating Disorder Support Forum banner
  • Important - Please Read This website may include conversations, media, and content around topics relating to eating disorders, trauma, addiction, and mental health. Please be aware that this content may be upsetting, difficult, or triggering for some. EDSF is intended as a place of safety. If you or someone you know is struggling with an eating disorder, Feast-ED.org is a resource that lists the organizations set up to help.

which one would you choose?

  • 20 / 4

    Votes: 8 27%
  • 12 / 12

    Votes: 22 73%

Which eating schedule is better?

219 views 12 replies 6 participants last post by  darkbarbie  
#1 ·
Okay, so as you know I usually do 2 meals a day (20 hours fasting window, 4 hours eating window) I've been doing this for a long time now.

But yesterday this happened: I had my 1st meal of the day and I was tired so I fell asleep. When I woke up, I had to leave my house immediately because I had an appointment so I had no time to eat again (even though I was hungry)

When I came home, I ate the 2nd meal, and I realised that I had the 2 meals in a timespan of 12 hours.

So what do you think would be better? 20/4 or 12/12 (with calories being equal, of course)

Changing routines is a big thing for me. It feels uncomfortable
 
#2 ·
Maybe from a digestive standpoint the 12-12 is better, less stress on the stomach from sudden increased volume? And I think eating across a larger window gives you more flexibility if plans get in the way- but you can still choose when you want the food i.e could still only eat in a 4 hour window, or you could make it a 5,6,7,8 hour window if needed
 
  • heart
Reactions: darkbarbie
#4 ·
The problem is that I feel the same level of hunger, no matter if I have eaten like 30 minutes ago or 13 hours... So it's hard to choose from the 'intuitive eating' standpoint because I feel ravenous hunger, constantly. But you are right in terms of volume, especially because I do volume eating and maybe I will feel less bloated with 12/12
 
#3 ·
I think the answer is in, 'what works best for you'.

There is no right or wrong answer.



Some of us find option 1 is best while the rest of us find option 2 is best.



Focus on which causes the less stress and less anxiety. And feels best suited to your standard day.


The other thing is, if possible, you can alternate. So on appointment days, you pick one way and non-appointment days, the other. (Tho with this it means being flexible which is something a lot of us struggle with)
 
#7 ·
I am doing omad rn (basically 23/1 or 22/2) and I am thinking about changing things. I really don’t know if changing when you eat even makes much difference, I just do it bcs I dont want to eat before 5 so I can sleep better and so I dont walk around bloated during the day. But its all cico anyway so I don’t see what changes with the same stuff. Whatever works for you is probably the best.
 
#8 ·
i totally get you. i find that once I start eating, if I am not busy I will keep going back and have eaten half my calories without even thinking about it just from low cal snacking. i think i was less saying "intuitive" (i dont even think that exists tbh), but more having something then not having anything till later- more like a broken fast? the hunger is real though, the only thing that stops it is overloading on caffeine or carbonated drinks
 
  • Like
Reactions: alias.zero