Eating Disorder Support Forum banner
  • Important - Please Read This website may include conversations, media, and content around topics relating to eating disorders, trauma, addiction, and mental health. Please be aware that this content may be upsetting, difficult, or triggering for some. EDSF is intended as a place of safety. If you or someone you know is struggling with an eating disorder, Feast-ED.org is a resource that lists the organizations set up to help.

Is the amount of calories you eat more dangerous than your BMI?

641 views 7 replies 8 participants last post by  TinySnowflakes  
#1 ·
For example, I know people who have been at higher BMIs and eating really low calories and suffered severe complications, and people who lost weight very slowly on high restriction and maintained a low BMI.

For me, for example, I lost 20 lbs in 2 months by eating 500 cal a day. Then I gained about 30 lbs in 4 months. For the past 8 months I've eaten 1100-1600 calories a day and lost the recovery weight by losing about a 1lb a month. Currently I'm 105 lbs @5'3. Because I've been eating every and all foods and lost so slowly, and I at risk for complications if I chose to maintain? I'm really having a crisis mentally. I finally feel comfortable at a weight, but I don't want to die from this. It's been quite sustainable but I'm worried that I've caused irreversible damage that just hasn't been discovered yet. Also, I'm a hypochondriac so there's that as well. I have awful health anxiety.
 
#3 · (Edited by Moderator)
I think the first most important thing is that your body gets the nutrients it needs to function. But there is a certain underweight, like below 13-14 bmi maybe, that is just dangerous in itself.

Anyway, what I can highly recommend is to have your blood checked if you are worried. Because that's the first sign if something is wrong. I usually have it checked every 6 months because I'm paranoid when it comes to electrolyte and vitamin levels.
 
#4 ·
I felt pretty okay at a bmi of 18 and maintained it, was very athletic and active. However more dangerous to relapse and get lower also thought about food 24/7 and was typically bingeing/restricting.
 
#5 ·
It really depends on how long. If you're restricting severely for a long amount of time, then your body will start to break down. But if you only restrict severely for a few days, you should be fine and your BMI would be more worrisome.
 
#6 ·
Severe restriction is definitely a big risk factor for health complications and/or early death. While low BMI's have there own set of health consequences just from being underweight, I am a firm advocate that severe restriction is dangerous at any weight. I was bedridden at a normal weight from restricting way too low my during my initial bout with AN, because I starved from a nearly obese BMI.
 
#7 · (Edited by Moderator)
It depends on how much body fat you have, ethnicity, if you're small boned/proportions, things like that. Person A could be way too skinny and be malnourished at a BMI of 18. Person B could be healthy forever at a BMI of 18. The content of the calories is also important. 1200 calories per day of leafy greens, rice, quinoa, beans, chicken, dark chocolate, olive oil etc is so much better than 3000 calories binge of candy and Oreos one day and then fasting for 3 days.

I had all normal blood tests at 5'8 and 110 pounds, except for mild anemia so the dr just told me to take an iron supplement. I'm a vegetarian so the anemia would have been normal even in a non-underweight person.
 
#8 ·
In my opinion both can be dangerous, the thing is that it is often more BMI focused to determine if a person is unwell - it is relevant and does cause health issues but more needs to be taken into account. I hope its different overseas but from what I've heard its similar.